extractingbench

3 extraction models, every provider

Each model is tested on every provider that serves it, because price, speed and limits differ from host to host.

Every model on every provider

ModelInputWeightsProviderList priceStatus
ClairicCloudflareText and imagesClosedCloudflare Workers AIserverless$0.10 per million input tokens, no output chargeNot run yet
NuExtract3NuMindText and imagesOpen, Apache 2.0NuMind APIserverless$1 per million input tokens, $5 per million output tokensNot tested yet: needs an account
Hugging Face Inference Endpointsdedicatedper GPU hourNot tested yet: needs an account
Our Mac Mini (run it yourself)self-runno per-document priceOptional, after hosted results
GLiNER2FastinoText onlyOpen, Apache 2.0Fastino APIserverless$0.03 per million input tokens, no output chargeNot tested yet: needs an account
Hugging Face Inference Endpointsdedicatedper CPU hourNot tested yet: needs an account
Our Mac Mini (run it yourself)self-runno per-document priceOptional, after hosted results

Not tested yet

  • NuExtract 2.0 (2B and 8B): no ready hosted API; needs a dedicated Hugging Face endpoint.
  • Clairic open weights: not released yet.

As of 20 Oct 2026, extractingbench has not published results. The planned lineup is Clairic, NuExtract3 and GLiNER2. Before this benchmark, every published accuracy figure we could find for these extraction models came from the vendors themselves.